{"iri":"https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R7HzG8t2MHvA1beqRfqgJ1l","label":"Appointments Clause Claim","sub_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDdZDW8VIPVbM8gI4n7Ippf"],"parent_class_of":[],"is_defined_by":null,"see_also":[],"comment":null,"deprecated":false,"preferred_label":null,"alternative_labels":[],"translations":{"de-de":"Anspruch aus der Ernennungsklausel","en-gb":"Appointments Clause Claim","es-es":"Reclamación de la Cláusula de Nombramientos","es-mx":"Reclamación de la Cláusula de Nombramientos","pt-br":"Reivindicação da Cláusula de Nomeação","fr-fr":"Réclamation de la clause de nomination","he-il":"תביעת סעיף המינויים","hi-in":"अपॉइंटमेंट्स क्लॉज क्लेम","zh-cn":"任命条款索赔","ja-jp":"任命条項クレーム"},"hidden_label":null,"definition":"An Appointments Clause claim is a legal argument asserting that a particular appointment or nomination made by a government official violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution. This claim contends that the appointment was not made in accordance with the constitutional requirements outlined in the Appointments Clause, which typically involves the need for Senate confirmation or compliance with other specified procedures, rendering the appointment or nomination invalid or unconstitutional.","examples":[],"notes":[],"history_note":null,"editorial_note":null,"in_scheme":null,"identifier":null,"description":null,"source":null,"country":null}