<owl:Class xmlns="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:v1="http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:folio="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" rdf:about="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RB0rUuUM6HTykEFjlYIaK2A">
  <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R8jIR8iqxwPvaiF10RkWcgO"/>
  <rdfs:label>Improper Expert Opinion Objection</rdfs:label>
  <skos:altLabel>Inadmissible Expert Testimony Objection</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel>Objection to Unauthorized Expert Opinion</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel>Unqualified Expert Opinion Objection</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:definition>An Improper Expert Opinion Objection is raised when a party in a legal proceeding believes that an expert witness is offering an opinion that exceeds their area of expertise, is not based on sufficient data or reliable methodology, or is otherwise not permissible under the rules governing expert testimony. This objection aims to ensure that expert opinions are relevant, reliable, and based on a proper foundation.</skos:definition>
</owl:Class>