<owl:Class xmlns="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:v1="http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:folio="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" rdf:about="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RCEx7g3wSm7TRkpl2WQko0s">
  <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R9Bk5v9AAJmhb4WcgIQjy29"/>
  <rdfs:label>Foundation and Competency Objections</rdfs:label>
  <skos:definition>Foundation and Competency Objections are raised when a party in a legal proceeding believes that evidence lacks the necessary groundwork for admissibility (foundation) or when a witness lacks the qualifications to provide reliable testimony (competency). These objections aim to ensure that evidence and testimony meet legal standards for relevance, reliability, and expertise.</skos:definition>
</owl:Class>