{"iri":"https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RCc5UaQRTagjPA2b0YSaSBi","label":"Assuming Facts Not in Evidence Objection","sub_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R7NB9WJzAFK6tIIGmfIj5Ay","https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RBMlUtTtbQUQxrZrkeF8Fpm"],"parent_class_of":[],"is_defined_by":null,"see_also":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R8IjWyMOHm19LbFKPf6DxY0"],"comment":null,"deprecated":false,"preferred_label":"Assuming Unestablished Facts","alternative_labels":["Assumes Facts Not in Evidence","Assuming Facts Not in Evidence","Inaccurate Hypothetical Objection","Presumption of Unproven Facts","Unsubstantiated Facts Assumption"],"translations":{},"hidden_label":null,"definition":"Assuming Facts Not in Evidence is an objection raised when a party in a legal proceeding believes that a question or statement implies the existence of facts that have not been formally introduced or established as evidence in the case. This objection aims to prevent the influence of unfounded assumptions on the proceedings.","examples":[],"notes":[],"history_note":null,"editorial_note":null,"in_scheme":null,"identifier":null,"description":null,"source":"Fed. R. Evid. 611","country":null}