{"iri":"https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDD0pYyXNm3TiZN6SyX0WTt","label":"Questionably Operative Law","sub_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RtSews3LsWL6xdoibt5V5R"],"parent_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R9yUA1quHDFsU18hnqw78wa","https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RVjXsbn73egfflZ0Tt2Pq7"],"is_defined_by":null,"see_also":[],"comment":null,"deprecated":false,"preferred_label":"Citator - Orange Flag","alternative_labels":[],"translations":{"fr-fr":"Droit d'application douteuse","de-de":"Fraglich anwendbares Recht","pt-br":"Lei questionávelmente operativa","zh-cn":"有争议的适用法律","ja-jp":"疑問のある適用法"},"hidden_label":null,"definition":"The efficacy of a legal authority (e.g., judicial opinion, statute, regulation) is in doubt, usually through the action of some decisionmaker (e.g., judge, regulator, legislator), through some act (e.g., statutory codification, review of statutory constitutionality).","examples":[],"notes":[],"history_note":null,"editorial_note":null,"in_scheme":null,"identifier":null,"description":null,"source":null,"country":null}