<owl:Class xmlns="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:v1="http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:folio="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" rdf:about="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDD0pYyXNm3TiZN6SyX0WTt">
  <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RtSews3LsWL6xdoibt5V5R"/>
  <rdfs:label>Questionably Operative Law</rdfs:label>
  <skos:altLabel xml:lang="de-de">Fraglich anwendbares Recht</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel xml:lang="fr-fr">Droit d'application douteuse</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel xml:lang="ja-jp">疑問のある適用法</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel xml:lang="pt-br">Lei questionávelmente operativa</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel xml:lang="zh-cn">有争议的适用法律</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:prefLabel>Citator - Orange Flag</skos:prefLabel>
  <skos:definition>The efficacy of a legal authority (e.g., judicial opinion, statute, regulation) is in doubt, usually through the action of some decisionmaker (e.g., judge, regulator, legislator), through some act (e.g., statutory codification, review of statutory constitutionality).</skos:definition>
</owl:Class>
