{"iri":"https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDQmmfqXdboeJpWPNffhVff","label":"Subsequent Remedial Measures Objection","sub_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R8R7UAZpzIQTdqNtctKj3XY"],"parent_class_of":[],"is_defined_by":null,"see_also":[],"comment":null,"deprecated":false,"preferred_label":null,"alternative_labels":["Objection to Evidence of After-the-Fact Repairs","Post-Incident Repair Objection","Remedial Action Evidence Objection"],"translations":{},"hidden_label":null,"definition":"A Subsequent Remedial Measures Objection is raised when a party in a legal proceeding believes that evidence of repairs or changes made after an incident is being used to prove negligence, culpability, or a defect in a product. This objection aims to encourage parties to make safety improvements without fear of such actions being used against them in court.","examples":[],"notes":[],"history_note":null,"editorial_note":null,"in_scheme":null,"identifier":null,"description":null,"source":"Fed. R. Evid. 407","country":null}