<owl:Class xmlns="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:v1="http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:folio="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" rdf:about="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDQmmfqXdboeJpWPNffhVff">
  <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/R8R7UAZpzIQTdqNtctKj3XY"/>
  <rdfs:label>Subsequent Remedial Measures Objection</rdfs:label>
  <skos:altLabel>Objection to Evidence of After-the-Fact Repairs</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel>Post-Incident Repair Objection</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:altLabel>Remedial Action Evidence Objection</skos:altLabel>
  <skos:definition>A Subsequent Remedial Measures Objection is raised when a party in a legal proceeding believes that evidence of repairs or changes made after an incident is being used to prove negligence, culpability, or a defect in a product. This objection aims to encourage parties to make safety improvements without fear of such actions being used against them in court.</skos:definition>
</owl:Class>
