{"iri":"https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RM6VrtfziMgMan8tAl6Ezq","label":"Uniformity Clause Claim","sub_class_of":["https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/RDkqXQLaqeFlhG4isnkHJuv"],"parent_class_of":[],"is_defined_by":null,"see_also":[],"comment":null,"deprecated":false,"preferred_label":null,"alternative_labels":[],"translations":{"de-de":"Gleichheitsgrundsatz-Anspruch","es-es":"Reclamación de la Cláusula de Uniformidad","es-mx":"Reclamación de la Cláusula de Uniformidad","pt-br":"Reivindicação de cláusula de uniformidade","fr-fr":"Revendication de clause d'uniformité","en-gb":"Uniformity Clause Claim","he-il":"תביעת סעיף האחידות","hi-in":"एकरूपता धारा दावा","ja-jp":"均等条項主張","zh-cn":"统一性条款要求"},"hidden_label":null,"definition":"A Uniformity Clause claim refers to a legal argument challenging the constitutionality of a tax or revenue-related law based on the requirements outlined in the Uniformity Clause of a particular jurisdiction's constitution. This claim asserts that the law violates the Uniformity Clause by imposing taxes or burdens in a manner that is not uniform or equal across the affected individuals or entities, potentially rendering it invalid or unconstitutional. The Uniformity Clause typically aims to ensure fairness and equality in taxation or revenue measures.","examples":[],"notes":[],"history_note":null,"editorial_note":null,"in_scheme":null,"identifier":null,"description":null,"source":null,"country":null}